Hepatitis C New Zealand

October 4, 2010

October 2010 NewZealand Hepatitis C Blog

Hepatitis C the  Nine Billion Dollar target market and  the race for new drug treatments

Hepatitis C is one of the most lucrative new markets for drugs in the world.

Motivated by the huge profits Drug companies are pouring resources in to discovering the next big treatment

For Hepatitis C, the standard has been  a combination of interferon and ribavirin.

In simple terms, ribavirin is an antiviral medication that stops the virus that causes hepatitis C from spreading. Interferon prevents viral replication in surrounding cells.

Now a score of companies are racing to bring new treatments on stream. Out front are Merck (NYSE:MRK – News) with boceprevir, and a partnership of Vertex Pharmaceuticals (NMS:VRTX) and Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ – News) with telaprevir.

Both drugs are protease inhibitors, which prevent a virus from replicating itself. While they treat the same disease, they are different in both results and side effects.

Used on patients who have had no previous treatment, boceprevir and telaprevir beat down the hepatitis C virus to undetectable levels in 66% and 75% of patients respectively

By most counts, the global market for hepatitis C products is now $4 billion a year. According to a report from the commercial analysis firm Research & Markets, that should rise to $8.5 billion by 2016.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/The-Race- … l?x=0&.v=1

These new drugs are taken with existing drugs in a combination of three drugs sometimes known as triple therapy

Details of Open hepatitis C drug trials in New Zealand

Some of these drug trials for drugs like telaprevir have been and are being conducted in New Zealand.
http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=hepatitis+c+New+zealand&recr=Open

Although the drugs are expected to get FDA approval next year in America (the most lucrative and largest market for these drugs) they may take several years more to reach New Zealand and be approved / funded by Pharmac.

They will add another pharmaceutical cost to treatment

If you have Hepatitis C genotype one it does improve your odds of successful treatment and maybe a shorter term of treatment.

Come out of the warehouse now ?

BURLINGTON, Mass., Sept. 27 /PRNewswire/ — Decision Resources, one of the world’s leading research and advisory firms for pharmaceutical and healthcare issues, finds that the launch of novel therapies for the treatment of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), including Vertex/Johnson & Johnson/Mitsubishi Tanabe’s telaprevir and Merck’s boceprevir, will precipitate several changes in HCV treatment. According to Patient Flow in Hepatitis C Virus, surveyed physicians plan to initiate treatment in at least half of their “warehoused” HCV1 patients one year after novel therapies become available. Patient “warehousing” is a term that has been coined to characterize the phenomenon of HCV patients opting out of treatment with current standard of care in anticipation of new therapies; psychiatric events, adverse events and liver health are top reasons keeping patients away from current therapies.

The report also finds that time from initial diagnosis to treatment initiation will decrease once novel HCV therapies are available. On average, surveyed physicians stated they wait 17 months to initiate treatment in HCV1 treatment-naive patients; this time will decrease to 7 months once novel treatment options are available.

“The arrival of telaprevir and boceprevir will alter more than the drug-treatment rate and treatment initiation timing in HCV,” said Alexandra Makarova, M.D., Ph.D. “Physicians indicate they would increase the capacity of their HCV practice to accommodate the additional patients expected once novel therapies are available.”

http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/launch-of-novel-agents-for-the-treatment-of-hepatitis-c-virus-will-precipitate-treatment-of-at-least-half-of-warehoused-patients-103849343.html

clutha

Drug survey  RECENT TRENDS IN ILLEGAL DRUG USE IN NEW ZEALAND, 2006-2009

Findings from the 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 Illicit Drug Monitoring System
(IDMS)

Scary reading with the growing methamphetamine use, As people inject  methamphetamine much more frequently injecting themselves forty or fifty time a day to maintain the high  amphetamine psychosis, irrational impulsive behaviour a bad combination for transmission of hepatitis C and other BBV. Many of these new methamphetamine idu people will be new to using intravenous drugs and naive in their safety precautions.

http://www.shore.ac.nz/projects/Final%202009%20IDMS%20report.pdf

Surveillance of HIV and Hepatitis C Prevalence among Attendees of Needle Exchanges throughout New Zealand Chantal Lauzon

Well an interesting read with lots of detail a thesis submitted for the degree of Masters of Public Health at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand  another resource for those interested in Hepatitis C and needle exchanges.

“Results
In total, data from 480 respondents were included in the analysis. The majority of
respondents were male (67.3%), of European ethnicity (79.4%) and aged between
35 and 49 years. Average duration of injecting drugs was 17 years. Overall, the
seroprevalence of HIV in this population has remained very low (<1%) and there
has been a significant decline (17.6%) in the seroprevalence of HCV between 2004
and 2009 (p<0.0001). Prevalence of HCV-antibody was associated with older age,
longer duration of injecting, and a history of imprisonment, methadone treatment
and tattooing. There has been a significant increase (20%; p<0.001) in the reported
use of new needles and syringes for every injection.
Conclusions
The decline in HCV seroprevalence in injecting drug users cannot be attributed to
any particular differences in demographic characteristics of survey participants or
to trends in risk behaviours associated with risk of HCV transmission. The
national introduction of the free one-for-one needle and syringe exchange
programme in 2004 has had a large impact on growth in distribution at needle
exchanges. This reduction in economic barriers to safe injection and subsequent
increased access to sterile needles and syringes appears to have had a positive
impact on injecting practice and is possibly a factor behind the decline in HCV
seroprevalence among New Zealand IDUs who use the needle exchange
programme. The 2009 Needle Exchange Blood Borne Virus Serosurvey
contributes to the evidence base supporting the effectiveness of needle exchange
programmes in reducing injecting risk and limiting the spread of HIV and HCV
among IDUs. “

http://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/10523/388/LauzonHCVSeroprevalenceInNZIDUs.pdf?sequence=1

The importance of narrative video

The english Hepatitis C Trust need new case studies to raise awareness in the press. We are always writing new reports, releasing new statistics and





Well that’s it

Best of Health

www.hcv.org.nz

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Hepatitis-C-New-Zealand/99254558387

August 8, 2009

Strategic Directions for Hepatitis C, New Zealand report HCTAG

Strategic Directions for Hepatitis C,

improving access to and uptake of hepatitis C treatment services.

HCTAG Hepatitis C Treatment Advisory Group
, NZ ministry of health

Thanks to NZ minister of health Hon Tony Ryall for releasing this draft copy

A few points that I found interesting the context for HCV Planning

The 50,000 figure with 1300 new infections per year, and we are treating around 600

“unless annual numbers of HCV positive New Zealanders receiving anti viral therapy  were to increase by % 300”

This would put the treatment numbers ahead of the new infections. At the moment we are going backwards every year with less treated than catching hepatitis C.

The current numbers are a joke, a token effort from The Ministry of health they are doing something just nowhere near enough to make an impact on the epidemic.

The pool of infected is growing every year, I could wear myself saying this, but fortunately this report lays it all out, in a much more logical manner then me.

Will anything change  ? NO .

The Ministry of health  are growing a massive public health disaster and there poor quality decision making and public health policy is growing the epidemic and future heath costs

Other recommendations

Key action areas increasing diagnosis

Key action area 3: Increasing the percentage of all people with HCV who have had the disease diagnosed

Key facts

An estimated 75 percent of the New Zealand population with HCV are unaware that they have the disease.

The major barriers to treatment in New Zealand with HCV infection are that people are unaware of their infection, or that the diagnosis is delayed until the liver disease is advanced, by, which time treatment is less effective. Because most people with HCV infection feel well or only have non-specific symptoms, early diagnosis requires targeted testing of all people who are at risk of previous exposure to HCV

• The largest undiagnosed pool of people with HCV are likely to be those aged 40-60 years old, who were infected 25-40 years ago, who at that time occasionally or even  once) injected illicit drugs, but went on to lead ‘conventional  Iives’.

This report should have been released months ago and the country can’t afford to wait to implement improvements. Absolute BS that it doesn’t in clued a implementation plan.

Its’ another reasonable report onHepatitis c in New Zealand it is a shame it will never be acted on and people will die and they will die increasingly in large numbers and they will die utterly preventable deaths. unless there is a significant increase in testing, diagnosis and treatment the number of people with end-stage liver disease – that is decompensated cirrhosis and liver cancer – will continue to increase . We are looking at: unnecessary death.

Draft copy released under OIA 29 July 09

http://www.hcv.org.nz/hepatitiscstrategynz.pdf (3 mgb file)

Meanwhile in England Hepatitis C out of control

undiagnosed; too few of those diagnosed are receiving the recommended treatment; and there are worrying regional variations in hepatitis C healthcare and delivery of treatment across the country. Of particular concern is the number of new infections each year – more than five times the number of people being successfully treated – indicating that prevention methods are not working. Clearly, the management of hepatitis C is out of control.

http://www.hepcoutofcontrol.org.uk/home.html

Hepatitis C is not slowing down in New Zealand it’s growing exponentially

RECENT TRENDS IN ILLEGAL DRUG USE IN NEW ZEALAND, 2006

a frightening reality vividly evident in this report

http://www.ndp.govt.nz/moh.nsf/pagescm/1109/$File/idms-2006-final-report-v2.pdf

“Forty-six percent of the frequent drug users had used injection equipment

after someone else in the past six months”

15.7 Summary of injecting behaviour

Forty-six percent of the frequent drug users had used injection equipment after someone else in

the past six months

Thirty-five percent of the frequent drug users had not always used a new sterile needle and

syringe when injecting drugs in the previous six months

The prevention effort of needle exchanges may have slowed the epidemic but even that seems questionable with behavior like above, the ongoing failure to address the problem is costing New Zealand dearly and is going to continue unless something is done.

Increase prevention efforts audit needle exchanges to optimise their services.

Anonymous community pharmacy blood testing for hep C  to try and reach the %75 of New Zealanders who are undiagnosed.

Show some leadership Ministry of Health and follow through invest in testing diagnosis and treatment.

best of health

www.hcv.org.nz

Powered by WordPress